For a very long time I have had a very vague idea of happiness. I originally believed that if I could be successful, if I could have all the comforts and sources of human pleasure, I’d be happy. My interpretation was, that if I’m a failure, if things are not going the way I want them to, or if I’m a wandering soul always in search of something or frustrated about things I already have, I wouldn’t be happy and if realities are other way round, I thought I would be. It seemed logical, and was definitely easy to believe. But no sooner than, I saw people who seemed to have it all, people who were substantially successful, also displayed a deep resentment, an ongoing state of emptiness, a state that was certainly out of the way I have perceived happiness to be, I was challenged to question my belief-system.
No doubt not having things that define outer comfort could result in frustrations at times, and even physical misery, but does their presence guarantees, we would be happy? Is our happiness really tied to what we have outside of us, may it be outer success, external possessions, wealth or even relationships which in some way or other are also external to us? Does our joy principally come from such sources? I am not saying it doesn’t. But I am not saying that it does either. However, if it is real happiness we are seeking in our lives, we must be aware where does it comes from, if at all it comes.
Perhaps the most logical step to begin this quest is to really and deeply understand what happiness means in the first place. Of course different people have many different views about it. Some views are contradictory; some are more or less similar while many are independent. I won’t be saying one view is better than other, but I do believe there must be something universal about happiness, something that we all can agree about and can accept as a fact. Any reality, if it is a reality, should be universal. It should be independent of how we perceive it or how we think about it. For instance, if an apple has to fall when dropped, it has to fall, independent of how we perceive it, and I strongly believe that all realities in life are built that way. That’s how the universe should operate, independent of our opinions. If happiness is a part of our reality, it must also have to be objective at least to a certain degree. However, let’s first of all discuss about happiness as it is perceived by different people. Of course, there are hundreds, if not thousands of ways of looking at happiness, and it’s impossible to mention them all here, but fortunately, broadly they all can be categorized into opinions resulting from two fundamental paradigms.
Paradigm first-Happiness is a conscious state.
It means thinking of happiness as an emotion, a feeling that we consciously experience. This paradigm is centered on the present moment, what you feel now, at this instant. If you feel good, it means you are happy and if not, you are not. The most important conclusion of this definition is that happiness is temporary, fluctuating and subject to ongoing change. Accepting this model of happiness is challenging for me, as I can’t believe that happiness should be temporary. Because if it is so, then it is never possible for us to be truly happy, as our happiness then remains nothing but just the function of our moods which in turn is the function of external circumstances that is ever fluctuating. If you live by this model, your focus is on instantaneous results, on short term pursuits, on things that will make you feel good instantly. You seek instant gratification and when you don’t get it, (and normally you don’t), you feel sad and frustrated. If you depend on this model you become a slave to the circumstances as those are what your emotions are tied to. However, on a positive note these kinds of people also believe in living each moment, they believe in living in now and here, in the present, with no consideration of the past or future. Their joy is tied to the nature of their present moment, and their every action is directed towards making the “this moment” enjoyable and worthwhile.
Paradigm second-Happiness is a sub-conscious state.
This seems to me a more accurate model of happiness. This model suggests that we do experience happiness but at a deep sub-conscious level. Happiness, as defined by this model, is not the joy we feel on the surface, nor it is something that we experience temporarily. It is a sense of deep inner fulfillment and being peace at oneself that comes from knowing that you have been living with integrity, in harmony with your values and in accordance with changeless principles. It comes from having a character you have found peace with. It can be permanent, depending on whether or not you have developed a character based on fidelity, values and integrity. It is also something you can experience even if you feel sad, even if you are in the worst of circumstances, or even if you are abandoned or lonely. The only necessary and sufficient condition to be happy, if you buy into this model, is that you have discovered your basic goodness and your unique values and have made a conscious choice to live by it. Simple as this definition seems, it’s not that easy to be happy at sub-conscious level. It’s not easy because it’s something you cannot fake. “Fake it till you make it” doesn’t work in this case. You have to be truly good, should you be truly happy. Following this model, however, makes happiness a choice rather than a chance, as you can always choose to be good regardless of your circumstances. So does it suggests success, relationships, comforts doesn’t matter? If you observe closely, only a person, who has developed a character which is guided by a conscience educated by principles, can really hope to have these things in abundance. Consider when you encounter a seemingly insurmountable hurdle as you move towards your goal. Will you give up? That will depend on whether or not you have character to continue. Imagine what if you were to assume certain amount of risks in order to get your business started by giving up your job, will you take this risk? You may take this risk if you have courage to face the consequences, which is again an attribute of character. How do you build and maintain meaningful relationships? I think in most cases it takes trust and unconditional love for relationships to foster. And certainly only people with strong character can be trusted and only such people could love unconditionally too. In this model of happiness, character takes precedence over personality. Future is more important to you than present, as your actions and choices reflect that you always take long-term into account. You tend to avoid things that have no value with the reference frame of your purpose. You live in the present, but your focus is on building a better tomorrow. This knowledge, this realization that you are moving towards your cherished existence, towards your life-purpose is what makes you happy.
Which model should you choose to live by?
I won’t say one model or paradigm is better than the other, because I am not sure about how to go about proving it. It’s also difficult for me to tell you which one is closer to reality. Definition of happiness, thus still remains a mystery. However, my idea of happiness is somewhat a combination of both these models in right proportion. Conscious emotions, I believe, were created for a reason. It is due to conscious emotions, you can fully experience the thrill of a moment. When everything has been said and done, life is but a series of moments entwined together. Life becomes an adventure when you combine these two models. You want to live life to the fullest, but at the same time in harmony of your values. Your choices reflect that you consider both long-term as well as short term. Whenever a good moment comes in your life, you grab it and enjoy it fully, but at the same time you do not get trapped in the emotion or compromise with your values for it. You care for today as much as you care for tomorrow. I think combining these two models gets us closer to real nature of happiness. However, I can’t say that for certain. I can only believe it to be true, and certainly I would want the same for you. But after all, it’s your choice. You are free to live by whatever model you think is accurate. All that we can really hope for is a revelation, to really understand what does being ‘truly happy’ means.